Monday, February 27, 2023

THE SIRENIANS: Manatees and Dugongs

Manatees and dugongs are both commonly referred to as “seacows.” Both belong to order Sirenia, which ranges from the early Eocene (50 million years ago) to Recent. Sirenians originated in the now tectonically closed-up Tethys Sea region (between Europe and Africa/Middle East) of the Old World. During the Miocene, the western European Tethys Sea was rich in sirenians (the former eastern Tethys region was tectonically uplifted land during this time). Although there are about 10 extinct genera, today there are only two genera. 


Manatees:

Manatees belong to family Trichechidae. Trichechus is only living genus, with three species. The dental formula for manatees is: 0/0, 0/0, indefinite/indefinite. That means there are no incisors and no canines. The indefinite cheek “teeth” consist of only low growths (transverse ridges) that somewhat resemble teeth. These cheek “teeth” are continually replaced from the posterior.


Manatees are characterized by having evenly rounded tail flukes, which are not notched. The bodies of manatees are often covered with algae and can have barnacles growing on them. Manatees have thickly bristled upper lips.





Three views of Trichechus = the only extant genus of manatee.


Manatees today are approximately 4 m long and weigh about 900 kg. They have a large tail, short neck, small front flippers, no hind flippers, no external ears, small eyes, and a blunt mouth with thick bristles overhanging the lips. The large horizontal, spatulate tail is the only means of locomotion. Their thick bones of manatees add weight.


Manatees are found today in rivers, mangroves, estuaries, and shallow-coastal areas in tropical and subtropical Atlantic and Gulf of Mexico/Caribbean, Central America waters (especially southern Florida). These gentle animals graze slowly and quietly (they have a slow metabolic rate) on aquatic plants. They are slow swimmers and can stay submerged for up to 15 minutes. They are known to rest on the banks of rivers. See the diagram at the end of this post for a summary of the geologic history of manatees.


Dugongs: 

Dugongs strongly resemble manatees, but dugongs are larger (up to 8m long), overall heavier, have a split tail (two horizontal “fins”), and the anterior part of the snout of the dugong is downturned and without the oversized bristles around the upper lips. The dental formula for dugongs is 1/1, 0/0, 2–3/2–3 = 12–16. The tusk-like incisors of dugongs are useful for rooting up vegetation.


Dugongs today inhabit tropical coastal seas around the Indian Ocean. They seldom invade rivers. Their geologic history is summarized in the diagram below. North Pacific dugongs apparently arrived there from the Caribbean Sea region. When this happened is not well known but it had to happen when there was an open seaway between the Caribbean and the Pacific Ocean. This condition existed best during the Eocene but became increasingly less viable toward the middle of the Cenozoic (e.g., Miocene and Pliocene times). 

Side view of Hydrodamalis.


Hydrodamalis = the geologically youngest genus of dugong. The last dugong in the North Pacific was Hgigas [= Stellar’s sea cow]. It was the only dugong adapted to living in really cold waters. It lived in cold waters in the Bering Sea region of the Arctic Ocean, where it fed on the fronds of kelp (= large stalked algae). This dugong was discovered in 1741. Twenty-seven years later, in 1768, this docile creature became extinct because of overhunting by humans.

 

The geologic histories of manatees and dugongs are summarized in the following diagram.

References Used:


en.wikipedia.org


Domning, D.P. and H. Furusawa. 1994. Summary of taxa and distribution of Sirenia in the North Pacific Ocean. Island Arc, vol. 3, issue 4, pp.506–512.


https://online library.wiley.com/doi/10,1111/j.1440-1738.1994.tb00129.x


Savage, R.J.G. and M.R. Long. 1986. Mammal evolution, an illustrated guide. British Museum of Natural History. 259 pp. [out-of-print?, but a very helpful book]. 

 

Wednesday, February 22, 2023

ARSINOITHERIUM: The Double-Horned Beast

The name Arsinoitherium (pronounced AR-sin-o-i-THEER-ium) is a combination of a name of a pharoh of Egypt and “therium,” which means "Arsino’s beast." This mammal stood 5’9” (1.75 m) at the shoulder and was 9.8’ (3 m) in length. It was rhinoceros-size (but not a true rhino) and heavily built with stout limbs. Its front legs were really good for pulling backwards (= graviportal limbs) when standing in muds, but this animal was not good at running.

 A mature Arsinoitherium zitteli Beadnell, 1902.


Arsinoitherium belonged to the odd-toed (5 toed) ungulates order Embrliothopoda = herbivorous early rooters and browsers. Embrithopods were related to elephants, sirenians, hyraxes, and the extinct desmostylians (see one of my previous posts on desmostylians).


The most distinctive feature of Arsinoitherium is its twin hollow horns, side by side, of massive size and arising from the roof of the skull. Both males and females had these horns. In addition, there were two small knobs high on the skull and behind the large pair of horns. These knobs were probably covered with skin and similar to the ossicones of giraffes.


Arsinoitheres had complete dentition (all 44 teeth present), with no diastema (gap) separating the anterior cropping teeth and the posterior masticatory teeth. Their cheek teeth (premolars and molars) are usually highly crowned, suggesting an ability to eat very tough vegetation. 


Arsinoitheres lived during the late Eocene and early Oligocene in northern Africa (Egypt, Tunisia, Lybia, Ethiopia, Angola, Kenya, as well as Saudi Arabia, Oman, Turkey, Romania, and possibly Mongolia). They lived in tropical rainforests and along the edges of mangrove swamps. It is possible that arsinoitheres could have been able to swim rather well.


Sources of information:

Benton, M.J. 1991. The rise of the mammals. Crescent Books, New York, 144 pp.


Savage, R.J.G. and M.R. Long. 1986. Mammal evolution, an illustrated guide. British Museum of Natural History. 259 pp.


en.wikipedia.org (2022) 

Sunday, February 12, 2023

THE LARGEST LIVING RODENT: THE CAPYBARA

Adult extant (living) forms, of capybaras can be up to 25 inches tall (at the shoulder), 4.3 feet long, and up to 100 to 175 pounds (50 to 79 kg) in weight. Their bodies are covered in short brownish hair, and they have almost no tail (only a vestigal one). They have short legs  (the hind legs are slightly longer than the front legs). There are four toes on the front legs and three toes on the back legs. Their face is rather long, in order to accommodate all their teeth. They also have blunt snouts.

Their feet are slightly webbed feet, and capybaras are superb swimmers. Like hippos, they have their eyes and small ears near the top of their head, thus they can swim also completely submerged. They live in densely forested areas (jungles), as well as on savannas near lakes, rivers, and wetlands/swamps. They are shy, social animals and live in herds up to 100 individuals, but usually only 10 to 20. Their life expectancy is 8 to 10 years. They are hunted for their hides and meat. They are also killed (sadly) as vermin. Some people keep them as pets.



Lunch time for a pack of capybaras at the Los Angeles Zoo. This picture was taken in the early 1980’s by the author. Capybaras are vegetarians. They are shown here eating cabbage or lettuce heads. Notice that the attendant is wearing very thick gloves (capybara front teeth are like sharp chisels).



Right-side view of a capybara skull. The mouth is large because the jaws are highly arched, which allows for a lot of grass to be held there until it moves onto the cheek teeth (the premolars in front and the molars in back), which do the grinding of the grass. Capybara are “mowing machines,” and their teeth are the business end of this “machine.” The upper jaw incisor teeth are thicker and shorter. The lower jaw incisor teeth are very long and projecting. In unison, the lower and upper incisors work like scissors, which is very efficient cutting of grass.


Like all rodents, their incisors grow continuously because they get worn down so fast by chewing mainly on grasses (rich in silica), aquatic plants, and reeds. These slightly curved teeth have a sharp leading edge, thereby enabling the teeth to efficiently nip/snip plant material. 


The back (or cheek teeth) (molars and premolars) of capybaras consist of vertical enamel plates stacked closely together. They become narrower toward the front of the jaws and somewhat slanted. The check teeth also have a very distinctive and complicated surface design consisting of very narrow projecting ridges extending from top to bottom along both sides of these teeth. The back molars are also taller and more massive that those in front. The cheek teeth, which also grow continuously throughout life, show variation in their shape throughout the life of an individual, thereby making it difficult to identify a species if it is based only on the shapes of its teeth. Early workers overestimated the number of species as being 33. Modern workers using molecular phylogeny studies have greatly reduced this number (e.g., in one geographic region, seven species are now recognized as a single species).   


Capybaras have also what is called hypsodont teeth (high-crowned with enamel extending below the gum line, providing extra hard material for wear and tear). The dental formula for capybaras is 1.0.1.3/1.0.1.3, which is a short-hand way of indicating the type and number of teeth on the upper jaw (= the first four numbers), as well as on the corresponding lower jaw) (= the second four numbers). They have 10 teeth on the left side of the mouth and also 10 teeth on the right side of the mouth; thereby making a total of 20 teeth. In sum, there are four incisors, no canines, 4 premolars, and 12 molars in the entire mouth. The gap between the incisors and the cheek teeth is called the diastema. Horses have a diastema too, as well as some other animals. The molar teeth of capybaras are sturdy and well designed for chewing plants. 


The scientific classification of capybaras is in a state of flux, but most workers use the following divisions: order Rodentia; suborder Hystricomorpha; family Caviidae; and genus Hydrochoerus. The genus name is Latinized and derived from ancient Greek hydro (“water”) + choiros (“pig) because they like to be in and around water and resemble tail-less pigs. Although they are colloquially, but mistakenly, called “water hogs” or “water pigs,” those designations are grossly inaccurate because hogs/pigs are not rodents.


Capybaras belong to a group of rodents also referred to as caviomorphs, which includes guinea pigs, pacas, rock cavies, chinchillas, and porcupines (especially the New World ones). One of these caviomorphs is most likely the direct ancestor of capybaras.

 

The earliest known rodents in South America are of late middle Eocene in age (approximately 40 million years old), but they were not capybaras. The earliest capybaras belong to genus Hydrochoerus and they are 9.5 million years old (= early late Miocene age) (see diagram below) and are found in the Buenos Aires Province of South America. The origin of capybaras occurred just after the middle Miocene climatic optimum, which was a time of world warmth. Hydrochoerus represents the main lineage of capybaras. There are two living species of this genus: Hydrochoerus hydrochaeris Linnaeus, 1766, which lives in northern Argentina (but not Chile) to Colombia and Venezuela. The other living species is Hydrochoerus isthmius Golden, 1912 which lives in northern Columbia, northeast Venezuela, and Panama. 


Perhaps the largest rodent of all time was a giant form of the caviomorphs called pakaranas (also called “pacaranas”), which are normally of small size and have relatively long tails. The giant form lived during Pliocene to early Pleistocene time in the southern coastal part of Uruguay, just south of Brazil in South America. Some scientists believe, however, that it is the same animal as the rodent Phoberomys, known from the late Miocene in Venezuela. The currently accepted scientific name of this giant is Josephoartigasia monesi. It belongs to family Dinomyidae. Individuals have been estimated as having a height of 1.5 m (5 ft.), a length of 3 m (10 ft.), and weighing approximately up to a ton. That would make them about the size of a rhinoceros, a bear, or a pickup truck. The image of this particular fossil capybara is minted on the “two-pesos” coin of Uruguay. This rodent is based on isolated teeth and a few skulls, thus its true size cannot be determined with total confidence.


As depicted in the time/paleogeographic diagram shown below, during the GABI (the Great American Biotic Interchange), South America became connected to North America via a land bridge in Panama during Pliocene-Pleistocene time (starting about 3.5 million years ago). That is when Neochoerus, a genus (now extinct) of capybaras evolved. Its fossil remains have been found in Central America, Arizona, southern Texas, Florida, and South Carolina. Individuals reached a size about 40 percent larger (e.g., 250 pounds total) than living capybaras. Today, there are some invasive occurrences of capybaras primarily in southern Florida. These were introduced by the release/escape of pets), but to date, breeding populations have not been confirmed there.

Biogeography of capybaras versus geologic time.

Research and drafting by R. Squires (Fall, 2022). [mya = millions of years ago]

  

References:


Britannica.com---An online source with great videos. FREE.


Lawlor, T.E. 1979. (Illustrations by K. Simpson). Handbook to the orders and families of living mammals. Second edition. Mad River Press, Eureka, California. 327 pp.


Savage, R.J.G. and M.R. Long. 1986. Mammal evolution, an illustrated guide. British Museum of Natural History. 259 pp. [out-of-print?, but a very helpful book]. 


Wikipedia.org---especially useful for looking up the scientific names of the animals/fossil names and especially for providing links to the literature.


Sunday, February 5, 2023

GLYPTODONTS

In my immediately preceding blog post, I discussed ground sloths, which represent an extinct xenarthran (“zee-nar-thrans”) group. In this present post I discuss another extinct xenarthran group, namely, the glyptodonts. 

Both ground sloths and glyptodonts originated in South America and migrated to North America.

Extant (still living) xenarthrans are tree sloths, anteaters, and armadillos. Interestingly, armadillos are the direct ancestors of glyptodonts (this fact is based on extracted DNA from an extinct glyptodont). 

Glyptodonts were large (up to car size = several tons in weight) and heavily armored. Their heavy shells were made of bony plates. Glyptodonts are named for their distinctive teeth, which were used for grazing. Additionally, glyptodonts also had large blunt hoof-like claws.


One of the most common glyptodonts is Glyptodon, which was about 9 feet (2.7 m) long. This glyptodont migrated to North America during Pleistocene time.


A plastic model of Glypyodon.

The skull of Glyptodont is nearly circular in shape, as shown in the following  image:


The largest glyptodont of all time was Doedicurus clavicaudatus, the only species of this particular genus. This strictly South American glyptodont species might have been the last surviving glyptodont. It is of Pleistocene age (8,000 to 7,000 years before present) and lived in Patagonia, South America. It weighed about 3,000 pounds, was about 13 feet long and 4 feet high, and had a spiked tail that weighed 88 to 143 pounds. This spiked tale was probably used for defense by means swinging it from side to side, thereby delivering bone-crushing blows to predators.

Doedicurus clavicaudatus.

As shown in my following diagram, glyptodonts arose in South America about 20 million years ago. They spread to southern part of North America after the continents became connected about 3 million years ago. They lived long after the disappearance of mammoths and saber-tooted casts, but the reason why glyptodonts went extinct is not known, (could it have been extinction by humans?).

Literature search and drafting by R.L. Squires, Fall, 2022.


All of the sketches of glyptodont shown above are based on figures in Fenton and Fenton, 1989, The Fossil Book, revised edition, Doubleday, New York.