This post concerns an unusual fossil specimen, which I used
for many years (as an extra-credit specimen) in my lab final for my geology major's class called “Fundamentals of Invertebrate Paleontology.” I had purchased the specimen many years ago, and its unusual size puzzled me for a long time, until I finally identified it as a very large brachiopod.
Some of you might know what a brachiopod is, but most people
(including many geologists who have
never had a class in the fundamentals of paleontology) commonly confuse them
with clams, even though these two groups belong to separate phyla. Brachiopods
belong to Phylum Brachiopoda, and clams belong to Phylum Mollusca. Perhaps in a
future post, I can illlustrate what the differences are in their shells.
Brachiopods are extant (i.e., not extinct), but they were much more important
in the past (especially the Paleozoic) than today.
Front view, Stringocephalus sp., Middle Devonian, GuangXi Province, China. Specimen is 12 cm high (about 4 3/4 inches). |
The large articulate brachiopod under consideration here belongs to
genus Stringocephalus, which
comprises a small group of species that lived during the Middle Devonian (about
385 million years ago). Stringocephalus
has an unusual shape and size for a brachiopod. It has a very inflated biconvex
shape with a very prominent beak. Its shells can reach up to 12.5 cm (about 5
inches) in height, and their shell wall can be as much as 0.5 cm (just less than a quarter of an inch) thick.
It has been found in northern Europe (especially Poland), China, Western
Australia, western North America (Brooks Range, Alaska; Nevada; and Sonora,
Mexico). During the Devonian, the continents were in very different locations
and positions that they are today, and the occurrences of Stringocephalus were within 30°N and 30° of the equator.
I also want to take this opportunity to let you know that the
"Clustrmap" that normally accompanies my blog has been inoperative for the past week. I notified the company, and, hopefully, they will soon fix the problem.
No comments:
Post a Comment